GET BLOG UPDATES
Categories
About Our Weblog
Christian Interest College Current Market Events Economy Family Finances Giving and Stewardship Health Care Inflation Watch Investing Principles Mutual Funds Retirement SMI Advanced Strategies SMI General Announcements SMI Model Portfolios Taxes
Archives
September 2010
August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 BLOGS WE READ
Bible Money Matters
Bucks (New York Times) The Capital Spectator Christian Personal Finance Church Giving Matters CT's Money and Business Debt Free Adventure Free Money Finance MarketBeat Money Help for Christians Money Rules, Debt Stinks Real Time Economics Redeeming Riches Social Bookmarking
Tag Cloud
SMI Visitor's Weblog
Welcome to the SMI Visitor's Weblog. Below you'll find selected excerpts reprinted from our Member's Weblog, plus occasional posts created especially for our visitors. If you are already an SMI Web Member, click the following link to go to the SMI Member's Weblog. If you're not a Web Member yet, but would like to have access to all of SMI's content including the SMI Member's Weblog click to learn about becoming an SMI Web Member. September 2, 2010Uncertain times, a certain GodEver struggle with trusting God in your finances? Join the club. When economy seems to be teetering and the stock market is a roller coaster, trusting God for your financial future (and, yes, your financial present) can be tough.
The Faith Radio Network, a ministry of Northwestern College, includes stations in Minneapolis/Saint Paul and Duluth, Minn.; Madison, Wis.; Fargo, N.D; and Sioux Falls, S.D. You can listen to the 14-minute conversation below — or right click here (and "save link as") to download an mp3. Posted by Matthew | 9:12 AM | TrackBack Category(s): SMI General Announcements Tag(s): christian financial, radio August 31, 2010New student loan debt clockThe college financial aid site, FinAid.org, has launched a counter that keeps track of aggregate student debt. This new "debt clock" has no particular useful function, except to cause users to say, "Wow, that much?" (and, of course, to drive traffic to FinAid and its sister site, Fastweb). Clock creator Mark Kantrowitz, who runs FinAid.org, concedes that the number is an estimate (although one based on government statistics). "I think it's probably in the right ballpark, give or take," he told the New York Times. Published figures showed $830 billion in private and federal loans outstanding as of June 2010. Kantrowitz is estimating that the amount is rising by about $2,854 a second (taking into account both new loans and repayments). Rapidly growing school debt has many people asking, "Is a college education still worth the investment?" August 30, 2010Be ye perfectScripture does urge us to "aim for perfection," but I don't think this is what the apostle Paul had in mind. From Money Magazine (via CNN): Chris Peplinski is pursuing his own brand of flawlessness: an 850 credit score. Money rightly notes that Peplinksi (and others like him also quoted in the story) are "obsessed." Of the score strivers MONEY interviewed, most check their score obsessively, at least every few months — at a cost of $50 or more a year. They also fixate on their credit reports, upon which the scores are based. There is, of course, no need for any of this. Sure, it's a good idea to check your credit reports every so often for errors (once a year is plenty and doing so is free). And, as noted in SMI's August-issue article, Know the Score (subscribers' link), it's also good idea to also check your credit scores once in a while. But there's no reason to be obsessed about any of this. If you simply live within your means and pay your bills on time, you'll be fine. Peplinkski makes his case below: August 27, 2010The Hindenburg OmenI've seen a number of articles recently discussing the so-called "Hindenburg Omen." I ignored them until today because I don't think it's a relevant issue at all. But I've received some reader requests to discuss it, so I'm doing so now. Mark Hulbert provides the following snapshot of this indicator:
The core idea behind the Hindenburg Omen is that it's bearish whenever there are a large number of both new 52-weeks highs and new 52-week lows on the NYSE. The trouble is that for this Hindenburg Omen, even when properly computed (more on that in a moment) it has a pretty stinky predictive record. Here's Barry Ritholtz's withering response to a recent Wall Street Journal article on the subject: Now, I'm open to all manner of data analysis. But when you tell me (toward the end of your story) that (emphasis mine): "The Omen was behind every market crash since 1987, but also has occurred many other times without an ensuing significant downturn. Market analysts said only about 25% of Omen appearances have led to stock-market declines that can be considered crashes," you have pretty much wasted my time. Wake me up when you find something with an actual correlation — last I checked, 25% isn't even in coin-flip territory. Jumping back to Hulbert, he brings up the very valid point that this indicator may not have even triggered under its traditional definition. Originally the threshold for new highs/lows was 5%, then it got reduced to 2.5% (you can read his full article for the details, if you're interested). But there are so many issues that trade on the NY stock exchange now that aren't even operating companies (think closed-end mutual funds, preferred stocks, etc.), there's a real question about the data the current Hindenburg alarmists are citing: According to Ned Davis Research, the institutional research firm, a Hindenburg Omen would not have been triggered if analysts were to focus just on common stocks. On Aug. 12, for example, the day that this Omen was supposedly triggered, just 0.4% of common stocks on the NYSE hit new 52-week highs, according to the firm. To summarize, there are plenty of things to be legitimately concerned about in the current economic/market picture. The Hindenburg Omen is not one of them. August 26, 2010Credit cards and college studentsThe Level 1 article in our latest Sound Mind Investing newsletter — Big News on Campus: New Law Limits Credit Card Pitches to Students (subscribers' link) — focuses on changes in credit card rules that will directly affect teenagers and young adults. Among them: Under the Credit CARD Act of 2009, card issuers are not supposed to open accounts for anyone under age 21 unless the young person has "sufficient income" and an "independent ability" to repay. (Alternately, an underage applicant can have a financially responsible adult co-sign on the account.)
CreditCardGuide.com (a site affiliated with well-known Bankrate.com) has been checking around to find out how various credit card companies are responding to the unclear rules. Without specific standards for what it means to have an "independent ability to make required minimum payments" nor for proving such "ability," it has been up to card issuers to lay down the policies. The outcome, not surprisingly, is a mixed bag of vague and lenient policies.... The potential problems are apparent: some young people will no doubt stretch the truth on card applications, claiming income that doesn't exist; others will simply claim students loans or grants as income, making the new rules largely ineffective. Asked how card issuers will gauge "sufficient income," Gerri Detweiler, a personal finance expert for Credit.com, told SMI that credit reporting agencies will use "capacity scores" for young credit card applicants. They're "similar to credit scores in that they gather information from various sources and predict an applicant's ability to pay," she said. Of course, credit agencies will have a limited amount of data on which to draw because most young people lack a financial history, so it is unclear just how helpful a "capacity score" will be. Whatever the challenges of implementation, these new rules are now the law of the land. We'll simply have to "wait and see" to judge their effectiveness. August 25, 2010Are bonds bubbling?Economists and investing analysts are engaged in a serious debate about whether the U.S. economy is headed toward inflation or deflation. The deflation arguments have picked up speed this summer, fueled by an increase in reports showing that the economy appears to be slowing again. While the experts remain (sharply) divided about whether we will tip into outright deflation or not, the mere threat of it has had profound implications on the investment scene. High-quality bonds are one of the few investments that would be expected to perform quite well in a deflationary environment, and investors have been pouring money into bonds like crazy over the past few years (though not necessarily because they believe the deflation story — there are other reasons investors have flocked to bonds as well, such as fear/loathing of stocks, asset re-allocation by aging boomers, etc.). The incredible surge of money into bonds and bond funds since 2008, coupled with the stark overall performance difference between stocks and bonds over the past decade, has led to intriguing questions: Are bonds in a bubble? Are stocks attractively priced relative to bonds? Unfortunately, there aren't clear-cut answers, largely because the answers hinge on the way the deflation/inflation economic path unfolds. And contrary to what many experts would have you believe, nobody knows what will happen next.
This chart (click here to enlarge) stunned me when I stumbled across it recently at The Big Picture blog. For some time now, SMI has been warning about the increasing risk of bond funds due to bond valuations getting stretched (see, for example, my October 2009 article, Re-Evaluating the "Safe" Part of Your Portfolio), but I had no idea that Treasury returns over the past decade resembled those of tech stocks during their heyday. Big Picture author Barry Ritholtz adds the following commentary: Over the past few months, I have been saying US Treasuries remind me of the dot com stocks circa 1997-98 in three ways: Plenty of others, though, say this isn't a bond bubble. They would argue this is merely the rational response to looming deflation on the horizon. While acknowledging that it's unknowable at this point how this will turn out (future deflation will mean bonds continue gaining, whereas avoiding deflation and a legitimate turn towards economic recovery will potentially expose them to grave danger), it is interesting to note that this long "reversion to the mean" process of stocks becoming cheaper and bonds becoming more expensive has led to valuation conditions we haven't seen in some time.
For example, consider this chart of the Dow Jones Industrial Average Dividend Yield minus the 10-Year Treasury Yield (courtesy of Bespoke Investment Group). The huge amount of money flooding into Treasuries has pushed their yields below the yield currently being offered by the Dow's stocks. Aside from a brief spike during the financial panic, this condition hasn't been seen in nearly 50 years. Whatever you think about the underlying merits of it, fund flows out of stocks and into bonds have been breathtaking. USA Today reports that since the beginning of 2008, bond funds have had $601 billion of cash inflows, while stock funds have seen $240 billion in outflows. But here's something to keep in mind: As headlines like this one from the New York Times become more common — "In Striking Shift, Small Investors Flee Stock Market" — remember that small investors usually aren't "ahead of the game" when it comes to timing their investment moves. More often than not, they do things at exactly the wrong time. August 24, 2010Now available: September issue of SMI!The September 2010 edition of the Sound Mind Investing newsletter is rolling off the press today — and, of course, it's already available online to our web members. Even if you're not yet an SMI subscriber, you can still access a few goodies (just use the links below).
Also free to non-subscribers is this month is an article on how you're likely to boost your returns if you invest at a particular time of the month. Read Profiting from Monthly "Seasonality" in the Stock Market. And our friends at Crown Financial Ministries explain how a strong sense of career direction can help young people avoid costly trial and error when pursuing an education. Find out more in Guiding Your Children Toward Their Career Calling. Rounding out our September issue are these subscriber-only articles:
Our September cover story — by William Bernstein, author of The Investor's Manifesto — offers advice on "Fine-Tuning the Risk in Your IRA, 401(k), and Other Retirement Accounts." In addition to encouraging articles and step-by-step guidance on how to implement our performance-producing and time-tested investing strategies, SMI web members also gain access to terrific online tools such as our 401(k) Fund Tracker. Not yet an SMI print subscriber or web member? Today's a great day to sign up! If you become a web member, you'll gain instant access to the September 2010 issue, plus back issues for the past three years! Posted by Joseph | 9:25 AM | TrackBack Category(s): SMI General Announcements Tag(s): new issue August 18, 2010Employees still taking huge risks with their 401(k)sWe've been writing for years about the huge risk employees take with their 401(k) savings when they invest a large portion in the company stock of their employer. And while the trends have improved over the years, this new Forbes report indicates a whole lot of employees have yet to get the message.
For example, when we last wrote about this issue in December 2007, 57% of the assets in Coke's 401(k) plan were invested in Coke stock. Forbes says that level is 51% today. Better, but not much. Let me put it bluntly for the benefit of new readers. This is one of the biggest risks "normal" people take with their retirement savings. It's also one of the most easily correctable ones, in most cases. I've heard people agonize about the decision to reduce the amount of company stock they own. In many cases they legitimately believe their employer is a great investment — significantly better than the alternatives they would invest in if they were to sell company stock. Some of them are even right about that. Unfortunately, it's a risk you can't afford. The landscape is littered with the carcasses of blue-chip, brand name companies whose employees never dreamed they would fail. And yet they did. You simply can not take the chance that your retirement savings will be devastated at the same time you lose your job and benefits. That's way too many eggs for any one basket, no matter how confident you are in that basket. August 16, 2010Tea Party pressure on defense spending?In addition to writing for Sound Mind Investing, I also churn out the "Money" page for WORLD, the bi-weekly Christian-based news magazine. I mention this because my report in the August 28 issue (already available online) relates to a comment someone made on the SMI member blog a few days ago: "I say 'Thank you Lord' for the rise of the Tea Party movement," he wrote. "Wouldn't it be great if the government had to cut back on spending and lower taxes?"
That's why it seems likely that the easiest area to cut will be the defense budget, as Tea Party-inspired conservatives make common cause with Congressional doves. Last week, Defense Secretary Robert Gates tried to get out in front of the budget-cutting forces by making his own proposals for defense-spending reductions. If you're interested in this sort of thing, read the WORLD story, "Tea Party at the Pentagon." Update: Tuesday's Wall Street Journal provides a brief primer on the Tea Party movement by Dick Armey and Matt Kibbe, authors of the newly released book, Give Us Liberty: A Tea Party Manifesto (HarperCollins). Posted by Joseph | 4:05 PM | TrackBack Category(s): Taxes Tag(s): federal budget, taxes, Tea Party August 12, 2010Condolences — and confidenceAs we noted in the cover article of July's Sound Mind Investing newsletter, the thing that drives SMI is our desire to help people become more generous givers. For many years, generosity has also the primary teaching focus of writer and pastor, Brian Kluth, author of the popular devotional, 40-Day Journey Toward a More Generous Life. Last night, after an eight-year battle against cancer, Brian's wife Sandi passed from this life to the next. We hope you'll hold Brian and his family in your prayers. Jesus said to her, "I am the resurrection and the life.
He who believes in me will live, even though he dies; and whoever lives and believes in me will never die. Do you believe this?" (John 11:25-26)
Powered by Movable Type |
|




In a conversation Monday on Minnesota-based
The 37-year-old stay-at-home dad from Rogers, Ark., has already nabbed 813 on the FICO scale, the credit scoring system most lenders use in sizing up potential borrowers....
But neither the CARD Act nor the regulations issued under the Act by the Federal Reserve clearly define "sufficient income" and "independent ability." The result: confusion.

Did you know that even during the stock market's "worst of times," perseverance still rewarded the steadfast? SMI's founder and publisher Austin Pryor has details in 

Many Americans would agree with that sentiment — in theory. But where would such spending cuts be made? Social Security (the biggest area of federal spending)? Medicare? Veterans' benefits? The choices quickly get tough because voters are on the receiving-end of so many federal dollars.