Categories
About Our Weblog
Christian Interest College Current Market Events Economy Family Finances Giving and Stewardship Health Care Inflation Watch Investing Principles Mutual Funds Retirement SMI Advanced Strategies SMI General Announcements SMI Model Portfolios Taxes
Archives
May 2012
April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 BLOGS WE READ
Bible Money Matters
Bucks (New York Times) The Capital Spectator Christian Personal Finance CT's Money and Business Debt Free Adventure Free Money Finance MarketBeat Money Help for Christians Money Rules, Debt Stinks Real Time Economics Redeeming Riches Social Bookmarking
Tag Cloud
SMI Visitor's Blog
Welcome to the SMI Visitor's Blog where you'll find selected excerpts from our Member's Blog, plus occasional posts created especially for our visitors. For SMI Web Members, click here to go to the SMI Member Blog. September 27, 2011Why so many mutual funds have multiple share classesIn the early days of SMI, circa 1990-1992, I had to spend a lot of time in the newsletter explaining the mutual fund industry and the differences between load and no-load funds. As Morningstar explains, the old black vs. white distinction between the two methods of distribution no longer apply:
Until [the mid-1990s], many funds were only available with loads and through brokers. Others were sold without loads, and you had to buy them directly from their fund companies—no broker involved and no outside help given. There was really no overlap across those two worlds, and disciples of each actually refused to do business with each other in many cases. Here's the thing, though: The debate never made much sense to begin with, it's over, and nobody actually won.
Why is the debate over? Because a majority of funds are now sold both ways via multiple share classes. This Morningstar article provides a handy history of how this happened and what the landscape looks like today. A good read for those who find the variety of fund share classes bewildering ("Why are there so many ways to buy the same fund?") Here's the wrap-up:
We still maintain that sticking with no-load share classes makes the most sense for SMI readers. And since we're doing the research for you to select the funds, you're free to gravitate to the broker who will execute your instructions conveniently and cheaply. We try to help you pick the one that's best for you in our periodic broker reviews (
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Visit our FREE reports hub and download:
Posted by Austin at 5:02 PM
| Comments (0)
| TrackBack
Category(s): Mutual Funds Tag(s): mutual funds, share classes TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry: Leave a commentEmail this post
Powered by Movable Type |
|
|||||||||




Until [the mid-1990s], many funds were only available with loads and through brokers. Others were sold without loads, and you had to buy them directly from their fund companies—no broker involved and no outside help given. There was really no overlap across those two worlds, and disciples of each actually refused to do business with each other in many cases. Here's the thing, though: The debate never made much sense to begin with, it's over, and nobody actually won.